$$ \sigma^2_{FSE} = \frac{1}{M_S} \left( \frac{f g \beta d^3}{c} \right) $$
$$ \gamma(h) = \frac{1}{2N(h)} \sum_{i=1}^{N(h)} [Z(x_i) - Z(x_i + h)]^2 $$ Statistical Methods For Mineral Engineers
$$ \ln\left(\frac{p}{1-p}\right) = \beta_0 + \beta_1 X_1 + ... + \beta_n X_n $$ $$ \sigma^2_{FSE} = \frac{1}{M_S} \left( \frac{f g \beta
In the world of mineral engineering, decisions have billion-dollar consequences. A mill that operates at 85% recovery instead of 90% can render a deposit uneconomical. A misinterpreted assay grid can lead to the development of a barren hill. Unlike chemical engineering (which deals with pure reactants) or mechanical engineering (which deals with deterministic tolerances), mineral engineering must contend with heterogeneity . A misinterpreted assay grid can lead to the
Low-precision measurements (e.g., a problematic conveyor scale) get adjusted more than high-precision measurements (e.g., a calibrated lab balance). The output is a single, coherent set of production data. Part 6: Regression Analysis for Recovery Optimization Linear regression is the workhorse, but mineral processes are rarely linear. Logistic Regression Recovery is a proportion between 0 and 1. Linear regression can predict values outside this range ($>100%$). Logistic regression models the log-odds of recovery:
A copper porphyry deposit. Inverse distance weighting might over-weight a single high-grade assay near a fault. Kriging detects the anisotropy (directionality) and assigns weights based on the continuity along the ore body vs. across it. Part 3: Sampling Theory – Gy’s Formula Pierre Gy dedicated his life to the statistics of sampling. His fundamental law is that the sampling variance (apart from geological variance) is inversely proportional to the sample mass.