Yet, the state’s seismic safety commission recently slammed Treasure Island’s risk assessment as "optimistic." Building massive residential towers (including a 20-story condominium) on this terrain has engineers wincing. One consultant called it "building Versailles on a slinky." Perhaps the loudest noise comes from housing advocates. For years, Treasure Island was a home to 2,000 lower-income residents in aging Navy barracks. To build the new "eco-district," the city forced most of these residents out.
That military legacy left a curse. When the Navy departed in the 1990s, they left behind a Superfund site: radiological contamination, lead paint, asbestos, and barrels of unknown chemicals buried in the sandy soil. For decades, the island sat in limbo—affordable housing for the working class, but a poisoned chalice for developers. slammed treasure island
Today, the redevelopment of Treasure Island is the most ambitious and controversial urban project in California. And the critics have not held back. The phrase "slammed treasure island" appears in news reports for three distinct reasons: environmental risk, seismic danger, and social equity. 1. The Climate Hammer: Rising Seas Treasure Island sits just 13 feet above sea level at its highest point. With climate models predicting the bay will rise by as much as 7 feet by 2100, engineers are in a race against the tide. To build the new "eco-district," the city forced
For the city of San Francisco, Treasure Island is a cautionary tale. It asks the question: Just because we can build something, should we? For decades, the island sat in limbo—affordable housing