Ciria Report 108 Concrete Pressure On Formwork -

Have a ready-mix engineer track the concrete temperature. If the truck arrives cooler than expected, recalculate P_max immediately. Case Study: The Heathrow Terminal 5 Pours When constructing the massive diaphragm walls for Heathrow Terminal 5 (London), engineers faced pours up to 15 meters deep. Ordinary hydrostatic assumptions would have required 200 kN/m² formwork—impractical and expensive.

In the late 1970s and early 1980s, CIRIA undertook a massive research project, observing real-world pours in walls, columns, and slipforms. The result, published in , provided empirical evidence that concrete stiffens (develops "shear strength") as it hydrates, thereby reducing peak pressure significantly below the hydrostatic maximum. ciria report 108 concrete pressure on formwork

This article breaks down every aspect of CIRIA 108, explaining how to apply its formulas, why it outperforms older standards like ACI 347, and how to prevent formwork failure on your next pour. Before CIRIA 108, engineers primarily relied on hydraulic pressure formulas, assuming that fresh concrete behaved like a liquid (Pressure = Density x Depth). While this approach (often called the "hydrostatic" model) is safe, it is wildly uneconomical. It assumes that until concrete hardens, every inch of height exerts full fluid pressure. Have a ready-mix engineer track the concrete temperature

Research (including later CIRIA updates) shows that for SCC, the coefficient (1.2) is insufficient. SCC can maintain fluid-like behavior for longer, leading to near-hydrostatic pressures. This article breaks down every aspect of CIRIA

Use a simple plumb line mark on the formwork with a time log. Or use modern IoT sensors that trigger alarms if the pour rate exceeds your R_max.